Welcome to the Category Flood: Why Differentiation Has Never Been Harder

Category Flood - brands drowning

If you work on brands regularly as a marketer or strategist this pain should feel very familiar. Here’s the scene:

You’re tasked with some new marketing effort for the brand – website refresh, a new ad campaign, social content, SEO/AEO, conversion optimization, etc. 

To tackle this, the first thing you need to do is get clear on the positioning. What is the brand’s unique value? What meaningful differentiation exists to help this brand catch the attention of its target audience and get them engaged?

Unfortunately, the brand hasn’t figured this out. 

So you crack open the typical sources: review sites, Google search, your favorite LLM, and start to gather a view of the landscape. 

Market leaders, challenger brands, smaller upstarts. 

It starts with a few notes until you realize you need to upgrade to a spreadsheet. Within minutes you have 10, 15, 20 competitors all competing for the same space, and all saying a lot of the same things. 

For this work to have any kind of impact the brand needs real differentiation.

But finding it in these conditions sends your brain swimming. 

There’s a reason for this.

 

The Category Flood

Category Flood is a condition in which a category is filled with so many brands competing around the same points of value that buyers can’t meaningfully distinguish one from another. 

In other words it’s a combination of:

  1. The volume of competitors
  2. The overlap in their offerings

The result is that all the brands become stuck under water. The buyer’s view of the landscape is one homogenous pool where all the brands in it blend together. 

For these brands, their marketing isn’t seen and their sales efforts either sink or drag on in endless cycles.  

Differentiation has always been a core challenge in marketing. 

But the era we’re in now has hit a new level of crisis. 

 

Proof of the Rising Water Line

There’s no shortage of data on the volume of competitors out there. 

 

15 Years of the Martech Map

The canary in the coalmine for this problem over the last 15 years has been the Martech Map. 

Scott Brinker, founder of Chiefmartec, has been tracking the number of marketing-centric products in the landscape since 2011. 

Over that time, the chart has grown 100X, from 150 products to now over 15,000. 

As of 2026, for the very first time in that span, it’s seen a plateau. In other words, around the same number of products entered the space as products that churned or drowned. 

The 1488 products that were added were the least amount in the last 4 years. And the 1367 that died were the most in the last 4 years. This resulted in just a net gain of 0.7%

On top of that it’s notable that 45% of the companies that churned were between $1MM-10MM ARR. So these were not just tiny startups, but rather companies that had seen real growth but couldn’t sustain it. 

They were swallowed up by the flood conditions. 

Review Site Saturation

You can also look at sources like the software review site G2 to see that they now support nearly 800 categories of products. Every one of those categories is filled with new entrants working to grab market share and mindshare. 

On the services side it’s no better. 

The website Clutch provides reviews and scores for agencies. Currently their Web Developer category includes 91,000 companies. Digital Marketing has 126,000. And the Design Agency category has 140,000.  

 

The 5-5 Squeeze

We’ve also been studying the issue of overlap in competitor positioning.

Our own data also shows the intensity in the overlap of positioning. Analyzing the value and differentiation strength of 500+ brands we found that only 5% had strong positioning. 

Positioning's 95-5 Rule - Only 5% of brands are differentiated

 

This prompted our concept of The 5-5 Squeeze – i.e. only 5% of buyers are in-market at a given time, and only 5% of brands are in a strong position to attract them.  

 

The 5-5 Squeeze - 5% of buyers are in market and 5% of brands have the positioning to attract them

 

And this is all before we take into account what AI brings to the table. 

The water level isn’t going to keep rising at a normal rate.

We’re now seeing a tsunami level injection of new competition. 

There are multiple factors that contribute to this.

 

What Drives A Category Flood

Category Flood drivers come from both outside and inside the brand. 

 

AI-Driven Development

Externally, new brands are constantly being developed to try and capture a portion of these categories. As mentioned above, the introduction of AI accelerates this at levels we’ve never seen. 

Claude Code and Lovable, to name two, allow technical and non-technical teams to build entire products and brands. What used to take months or years can sometimes be spun up over a weekend. 

 

Brands Table-Staking Themselves To Death

There are internal behaviors to consider here too. 

Feature-chasing accelerates category flood. Brands see what their competitors offer and in fear of losing ground, play copycat by adding similar functionality to their own product or service. 

This is another place where AI becomes the ultimate accelerant. In the same way a team might create a new product, they can also spin up a matching feature set.

The result is a brand table-staking itself to death. 

In other words, rather than building up to get above the water line, they build out and create more and more weight that anchors them to the bottom. 

Brands anchor themselves to the bottom with feature-matching

 

Brands Don’t Recognize They’re Underwater

Author David Foster Wallace once shared this parable at a commencement speech: 

Two young fish are swimming when an older fish comes by and says, “Morning boys, how’s the water?” The two fish swim a bit more, then one turns to the other and says, “What the hell is water?”

Brands get so deep in the flood that they lose perspective on the problem.

Part of this is because brands, by default, tend to be much more focused on themselves than the competition. 

This leads to brands not giving proper attention to competitors. Without clear, consistent ways to track the competition it creeps up over time.

 

Weak Support From Leadership and Tools

Even when you recognize the need for better differentiation it’s tricky to fix.

At the agency level you only have a few options: take the brand’s strategy at face value, sneak in time for research and eat the costs, or ask for more budget to do the work properly knowing the client will almost definitely push back.

And when you look at potential tools to help, they’re not built to solve competitive differentiation:

  • Generic LLMs lack the context, frameworks, and competitive data to provide real insights on differentiation
  • Competitive Intelligence tools provide outputs for sales conversations (battle cards, objection handling, etc.). They tell you how to win a deal not how to create a differentiated brand strategy.

With all this in mind, what are some strategic ways to address it?

 

Getting Above The Water Line

Every brand out there has to deal with deep competitive waters on some level. Here are some strategies to survive:

 

Release the Feature-Match Anchor

At a time when technology makes execution easier than ever, the urge to add endless functionality is more powerful than ever. 

While competitors add bloat and weight that anchors them to the bottom, you can win by resisting the table-staking temptation. 

It’s critical to invest resources in areas where the brand either has a clear advantage or there’s an open space of underserved customer needs. 

Building the right things – and even building less – becomes a massive strategic advantage. 

 

Evaluate and Track Competitors Consistently

Every brand needs a clear view of the competition. Buyers evaluate the value of a brand relative to the other solutions they could use. 

Effective competitive analysis requires two types of consistency:

  1. A consistent, apples-to-apples way to evaluate a brand and its competitors against each other to understand relative strengths and weaknesses
  2. Conducting this analysis on a consistent basis so that changes in the category and landscape don’t go unnoticed

When you’re underwater, this is the periscope to get a better view.

 

Create Higher Ground

The ultimate fix is to get above the water line. It’s one thing to know you should build up, but the real value comes from understanding how and where to do that. In other words, what areas of strength the brand can double down on so it’s seen and remembered. 

With clear, consistent analysis a brand can narrow in on where:

  1. It delivers value at a high level for its customers’ most important needs
  2. It has the most separation from the competition 

Building these skills and habits might be the most important thing brands can do to get the oxygen they need to survive.

Category Flood - build to higher ground

 

Flood Levels Only Go In One Direction

The Category Flood is not going away and the water is only getting deeper. This means more and more brands will be stuck underwater out of sight and out of mind. 

It’s up to internal leadership along with the teams that support them to recognize this problem and embrace it head on.  

The brands that survive in the coming years won’t be holding their breath waiting for this to pass. They’ll be the ones building higher ground while everyone else keeps adding weight.

If you want a consistent way to analyze the competition and get context-rich analysis for new types of differentiation, try smokeladder.com

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.

Best brand positioning and messaging software and tools

Email marketing platform positioning

Summary

Positioning and messaging software is a new niche category. While this work is critical to help a brand stand out in a crowded market landscape, it’s traditionally been a very manual lift for strategists and marketers. There are many products that can help gather pieces of data around a brand’s positioning and messaging but there’s been a big gap on the strategy side. This guide helps tease apart this emerging category to help you find the best solution to support your positioning and messaging work.

If you do any kind of work on a brand – whether that’s internal on your own brand or external on a client’s brand – your success is dependent on the strength and clarity of the brand’s positioning and messaging.

Every point of brand communication depends on positioning and messaging. This includes content across social media posts, blog articles, videos, podcasts, to ad campaigns, to sales conversations – even memes. 

Positioning and messaging are the strategic heart of a brand. It makes sure all those efforts align and tell a cohesive, differentiated story to the brand’s audience. 

Working on positioning and messaging falls into two camps. Either founders and internal marketing teams handle it or they hire outside help from an agency or consultant. 

No matter who’s leading the charge, you need data and frameworks to clarify key components of the brand:

  • Customers: who the brand serves and the core needs they aim to fulfill
  • Competition: what other solutions exist in the market and what their strengths and weaknesses are relative to the brand
  • Offering: how the brand delivers unique, differentiated value to solve the key problems of its target customers

From there you then need to create key strategic messaging to communicate those ideas. 

It’s a niche set of challenges that require specific skills and tools. 

 

What are positioning and messaging products?

Positioning and messaging software is a new category designed to help tackle these fundamental strategic needs. 

A product in this space has to provide frameworks and data geared toward strategists, marketers, and founders. The goal is to analyze the positioning and messaging of both a brand and its competition. In today’s marketplace, most categories have  grown from a handful of key competitors to sometimes dozens of brands. Every one of them aims to steal fragments of market share and mental availability with customers. 

It’s a complex challenge to gather and make sense of all the necessary data.  

To succeed in this space a tool needs to help surface the most important strategic information about brands clearly and consistently. 

 

Why use positioning and messaging software?

We’re entering into a new age of competition in the market place. The rise of AI continues to make it easier and easier for new brands and products to launch. For existing brands it’s become even easier to copy features and functionality of competitors. 

This all adds up to an incredible amount of noise in the landscape. More options to navigate and more options that might look and feel like each other. 

Doing positioning and messaging work totally by hand was once a manageable task. In this evolved landscape it’s become unwieldy. 

An evolved market place calls for evolved tools. 

 

The benefits of a great positioning and messaging and product:

  • Specificity of data: This isn’t about accessing a firehose of every kind of data available. The aim is to access data that’s hyper-focused and can inform key positioning and messaging decisions.
  • Clarity of data: The data that’s delivered needs detail without being so dense that it’s impossible to interpret. 
  • Faster actionable insights: With the volume of competitors to consider speed becomes a critical factor. Analysis and insights need to be quick to manage the scope of brands in consideration.
  • Reduction in manual effort: The tool has to make the user more efficient. Take the tedious, repetitive tasks related to areas like research and let the user focus on higher level thinking. 
  • Differentiation support: At the center of positioning and messaging the goal is to help a brand set itself apart. A great product in this space helps ease this core function.
  • Consistent views: Reviewing data across dozens of brands requires a repeatable process that allows you to compare and contrast different solutions and uncover strengths and weaknesses. 
  • Concept ideation: There should be easy ways to leverage the analysis of a brand to help inform revised messaging and positioning. 
  • Decision enablement: The data and insights provided need to support action to be of value. Products in this space have to support users to make better, more confident decisions.
  • Cost-to-insight ratio: Brands of every size from startups to enterprise need to do this work. Agencies and consultants who focus on these areas need better tools that aren’t cost prohibitive. 

 

 

13 best positioning and messaging products and tools

As a new niche category most tools that help with positioning and messaging only focus on small pieces of the puzzle. This list looks at a range of products that contribute to positioning and messaging work. For each product we look at their individual strengths, weaknesses, and who the target audiences are. 

SmokeLadder's UI

 

1. SmokeLadder: Best for researching, analyzing, and clarifying positioning and messaging 

SmokeLadder is the only software product focused on data-driven positioning and messaging. The product started from the ground up to tackle these challenges. Its functionality and features all support strategists, marketers, and founders who do the work. While most of the products in this list provide different types of data that can help inform positioning and messaging, SmokeLadder provides both data and frameworks tailored to create clarity around these areas. It leverages AI models informed by a decade of strategic service work from its parent company, Map & Fire. 

SmokeLadder provides all the following analysis and insights:

  • Fast analysis: Any brand can be analyzed in under a minute. Any data from previously analyzed brands is available instantly. 
  • Positioning value points:  Every website gets evaluated across 24 points of customer value (save time, reduce effort, lower cost, integration, marketability, etc.). This creates a consistent scorecard to identify a brand’s specific strengths and weaknesses. 
  • Differentiation: A brand’s value points help compare and contrast with competitors (and category averages) to discover areas of where the brand has separation.
  • Message clarity: The messaging rubric scores each brand across 10 criteria to see whether it communicates information on key elements such as: target customer, brand category, offering definition, points of differentiation, as well as its use of industry jargon and vague words.
  • Message ideation: The message builder feature takes all the key inputs for a brand and generates strategic messaging concepts. 
  • Category benchmarks: Based on thousands of analyzed brands, SmokeLadder provides category average scores to help determine whether a brand conforms or separates itself from the baseline.
  • Category insights: Insights around the brand’s key competitors, customer needs, and factors that would cause a user to switch from one solution to another are all provided by default.
  • Target persona: A brand’s target persona that includes demographic and firmographic points along with typical Jobs to Be Done needs and expectations.
  • SWOT analysis: Comparison of the brand against category competitors in a SWOT format to identify both strategic opportunities and challenges. 
  • Brand brief: Summary of core insights across key areas compiled into a downloadable and shareable PDF to be used internally and with clients. 
  • Visual analysis: To assess the effectiveness of the brand’s visual communication, there are insights and scores to evaluate its visual quality and specific visual elements, including logo, colors, images, typography, etc. 
  • Searchable brand archive: Thousands of previously analyzed brands can be searched and reviewed based on their name, category, and specific value point strengths. 
  • Actionable insights: Positioning and messaging sections allow users to generate key insights from the provided analysis to help interpret the information and inform next steps. 
  • Weekly email reports: For saved brands, SmokeLadder sends automatic email reports on the brand’s current scores, changes to scores, and information about key competitors to keep users up to speed. 

 

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

SmokeLadder is purpose-built for working on positioning and messaging. It provides specific frameworks to analyze a brand’s current positioning and messaging and structures the data to allow for easy comparison between competitors. It also includes insights to help interpret the data and guide next step actions to take advantage of the learnings. It provides deep analysis within minutes and has affordable monthly plans aimed at large and small teams as well as individual consultants.  

Who the ideal customer is:

The ideal customers are agencies and consultants who work on positioning and messaging projects regularly for their clients. It allows them to evaluate brands, get up to speed on their strategy, and analyze large groups of competitors. Because of its speed and affordability it’s also a great tool for founders and internal marketers to keep tabs on their own brand and competitive set. Sales teams would also benefit from SmokeLadder to learn about new leads and understand their competitive challenges. 

 

2. BrandWatch, 3. Brand24: Best for tracking social conversation

BrandWatch and Brand24 collect and analyze data points from social media channels so that you can understand interest and sentiment for a brand through the lens of consumers. These insights can help a brand refine its offerings and content to align with the needs of its target audience. This type of software is best suited for large brands that generate a lot of social discussion. 

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

Understanding how customers think and speak is a core part of positioning. Using their own language is also an ideal touchpoint to help craft authentic messaging and content. While this data helps inform marketing strategy and validate messaging resonance it’s not directly aimed at analyzing and improving a brand’s core positioning.  

Who the ideal customer is:

Marketing managers for medium to large brands are the target audience as they have the size to generate enough social conversation to utilize the tools and support their cost. 

 

4. Crayon, 5. Klue: Best for gathering competitor and sales data

Crayon and Klue provide intelligence around competitor products and services as well as analysis of internal sales calls to inform marketing and sales efforts. This information helps brands to stay up to speed on features and pricing of key competitors to sharpen head-to-head marketing materials, create battlecards, and maintain a competitive edge.  

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

These products tackle another key pillar of positioning with its tracking and insights of the competitive market. Staying up to date on competitor offerings and analyzing internal sales activity allow for marketing and sales teams to position their own offerings in an optimal light in real-time on a sales call. These tools are excellent for enabling internal teams but don’t provide frameworks to craft core brand positioning and messaging. 

Who the ideal customer is:

Senior staff who support sales teams at larger enterprises via sales enablement, competitive intelligence, and revenue operations. 

 

6. Semrush, 7. Ahrefs, 8. SimilarWeb: Best for tracking search data

Semrush, Ahrefs, and SimilarWeb focus on providing data and insights around traditional SEO research, search data, and AI search (GEO). SimilarWeb also provides estimated traffic around website traffic. This data helps brands understand how their target audience finds them and improve alignment with their needs. This data helps track and inform strategies around the brand’s content, social, and search ad efforts.  

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

Search is a valuable channel for gauging demand for products and services and aligning with that demand. It provides insights around terminology and words used by consumers to make messaging more impactful and reverse-engineer positioning direction. This data provides key feedback on performance of content but the tools aren’t designed to craft core positioning.  

Who the ideal customer is:

Marketing lead for a brand or agency. These tools have more flexible pricing options that make them accessible for both large and small companies. 

 

9. Wynter: Best for conducting qualitative messaging research

Wynter is a research platform that provides feedback on the messaging and awareness of B2B brands. Like other audience panel products, Wynter allows users to select criteria for their target customer and then survey them on the brand’s content. Wynter prides itself on the vetting of participants in their panels to ensure fit of their roles and experience.  

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

In order to ensure a brand’s messaging and content are clear and effective it’s crucial to test and validate with your ideal customers. Wynter’s format allows brands to run fast tests before launching to a wide audience. This type of feedback also allows for iterative validation over time. The results focus more on strategic guidance on improvements versus more in-depth strategy and competitive differentiation. 

Who the ideal customer is:

VP or director of marketing at a medium to large B2B enterprise.

 

10. ChatGPT, 11. Claude, 12. Perplexity, 13. Gemini: Best for ad hoc strategy support

Almost every brand now uses off-the-shelf LLM products in at least some capacity. These general purpose tools can help with everything from writing code to brainstorming ad copy. Their greatest strength is in their total flexibility to work on any type of problem. Their weakness is that they’re a classic jack of all trades, master of none. They can access information across any topic however they’re dependent on the user to provide the right question, context, and structure in order to get any kind of useful response. Without that strict level of guidance LLMs may provide responses that are vague, inaccurate, or in some cases hallucinated. 

How it aligns with positioning and messaging work:

LLMs can provide support around positioning and messaging work in various capacities. The challenge is that without the constraints and support of specific, vetted frameworks there’s no consistency around the outputs. A standard LLM is also based on text-only responses so it lacks the visual layout to make content digestible. LLMs also have no specific dataset of information or defined scoring system to draw from to help inform deeper insights on competitors and market categories.

Who the ideal customer is:

Any level of strategist or marketer seeking base-level feedback and support. 

 

Key features for a great positioning and messaging product

Positioning and messaging are complex strategic concepts that require research, context, and frameworks, across a wide range of inputs. There’s then a level of crystallization required to make that information actionable. This is why positioning and messaging work has historically been done manually via senior-level strategists and marketers.  

The features you should focus on when evaluating a product in this space are:

  • Clear frameworks: This provides the consistency and structure to organize data across the core brand and competitor brands
  • Category data: Not all brand data is equal when it comes to positioning and messaging. You need data about customers, their needs, the competition, the category, and the value of a brand’s offerings. And you need a breadth of data to identify strengths and weaknesses of brands across a range of categories. 
  • Easy-to-use interface: The product should make data digestible for the user. The easier it is to access data and insights the more efficient you’ll be with the tool.
  • Fast results: Because you need to analyze the parent and a list of competitors the speed to insight factor is critical. 
  • Shareable insights: This work can’t exist in a vacuum. You’ll need ways to share results with others whether that’s a client or other members of the team.

 

The rise of the positioning and messaging software category

Positioning and messaging work is only growing in importance. Competitive noise is at an all-time high and it’s getting more intense every day. 

While this category only has one clear leader at the moment with SmokeLadder, there are other products that are adjacent and can help provide additional support to the work.

The key is to use tools that help you identify, refine, and communicate the unique qualities of the brand you’re working on quickly and easily so that you can keep that level of differentiation sharp as the landscape evolves.

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.

Why we built the first data-driven product to help brands win with positioning

Story behind SmokeLadder

Positioning a brand to stand out in a crowded market is really hard. You need to understand your own unique value as well as how that value compares and contrasts with competitors. We built SmokeLadder for this exact purpose – provide fast, standardized, data-driven positioning insights to help brands stand out and win.

 

Market landscapes have never been so crowded, and it’s only getting worse. This means getting your brand to stand out for your target customer is going to keep getting harder. 

Clear, memorable positioning is critical for a brand to thrive and survive.

Positioning is the cornerstone of your brand’s strategy. It informs every aspect of your brand’s communication across marketing, sales, and content.

It includes:

  • Who you serve
  • What problems those customers need to solve
  • How your brand delivers a solution to satisfy those needs
  • Where you differentiate from competitors in a meaningful way

If you’re not clear on those points there’s no way to connect with your customers let alone make a memorable impression.

As the owner of an agency that does research and positioning work every single day, I’ve seen how critical it is – and I’ve seen how many companies struggle to get it right. 

For other areas of business there are plenty of tools to measure and compare effectiveness of brands. A great example of this is how products like Semrush and Ahrefs provide standardized measurements on a brand’s SEO footprint.

But there’s no equivalent to this for positioning.

There isn’t a standard, quantified way to measure and compare value provided between brands.

We built SmokeLadder to fill this gap and elevate how businesses approach the positioning process.

Specifically, we wanted to address some key problems:

  • It’s hard to get perspective on where a brand’s positioning is strong and weak
  • There’s no consistent way to compare and contrast one brand against another
  • Getting feedback on a brand’s positioning and value prop is slow and expensive
  • There isn’t a go-to source of standardized analysis for the positioning of brands

Before jumping into those challenges, there are a few learnings from our past 9+ years working on positioning that helped inform our approach with SmokeLadder.

 

Three key learnings we’ve had on how to develop unique positioning

After working on positioning with dozens of brands across a wide range of categories, there have been three key ideas that make our process effective.

 

Positioning Learning #1: Establish a consistent set of value points

Positioning starts with understanding the different types of value you provide to your customers. 

The challenge is that there are so many different things that customers care about in a buying decision depending on the industry and the offering.

This includes basic points like saving time and lowering cost – and more complex points like reducing risk and providing responsive support.  

To help standardize this we’ve utilized different frameworks such as the Elements of Value to create a baseline of all these different value points.

With a standard in place it allows you to compare one brand against another on an even playing field.

For SmokeLadder we took those influences and established 24 points of value to measure each business on.

 

Positioning Learning #2: Quantify subjective value

Once you have the points of value you want to consider, you need a way to determine how well each brand performs across those points.

This step centers on applying a numeric grade based on the brand’s focus around each point of value.

One of the best ways we’ve found to do this is to analyze the brand’s website, messaging, and content to see how they articulate their focus.

A brand’s website should be the most digestible expression of their positioning. That’s what customers evaluate them on, so that’s what we use to evaluate them on as well.

By analyzing their content we can make an educated assessment of how well a brand delivers on each point of value and translate that into a numeric grade. 

 

Positioning Learning #3: Visualize differences of value to see where you can stand out

The last step is that we need to visualize the grades for each brand to help see where strengths and weaknesses exist.

Displaying these grades across the points of value in a graph format allows us to identify positioning opportunities for a brand.

We want to find points of value where:

  • The brand scores high
  • The brand has the most separation from competitors

Points that hit both factors represent what customers care about and remember due to the differentiation.

We used these learnings to inform how we would tackle the positioning problems we know are the most critical for brands to solve.

Which brings us to SmokeLadder’s key benefits and capabilities.

 

SmokeLadder benefit 1: Show a brand where it’s strong and weak

Before you can determine your differentiation you first need to set a baseline of your own points of strength and weakness.

What type of value do you provide to satisfy your customer’s most important needs?

SmokeLadder automatically collects the messaging from a website and uses AI to analyze the content to grade it across our 24 points of value on a scale of 1 to 10. 

This gives you an outside perspective on the position your brand communicates to your audience.

Key value points for positioning

The analysis includes both a quantitative score for each point of value as well as a qualitative description behind the score (see examples in the next point).

This step by itself can provide great insight into how well you’re capturing what you believe is unique about your brand.

We combine these value grades with differentiation scores compared to our category averages to provide a cumulative Total Positioning Score.

Total Positioning Score - SmokeLadder

We calculate our category averages based on the thousands of sites we’ve already analyzed.

 

SmokeLadder benefit 2: Make it easy to compare and contrast one brand against another

In addition to analyzing your own brand, SmokeLadder can run the same analysis on any of your competitors.

Because we grade and rank all sites across the same points of value it:

  • Provides an easy way to compare grades to find relative advantages
  • Allows you to visualize those differences to identify opportunity gaps 
  • Gives written insight into why a competitor scored what it did

 

Compare and contrast positioning of two brands

This type of competitive intelligence is invaluable to gain perspective on how your target customer might view your brand against a competitor in an evaluation process. 

If your brand doesn’t have clear points of separation that prospects can see and feel it’s almost impossible to expect them to remember you.

With SmokeLadder you can analyze market leaders, other challenger brands, and indirect competitors that your audience might consider.

And you can do it quickly and consistently.

 

SmokeLadder benefit 3: Get feedback on your positioning and value proposition

We’re huge proponents of customer and market research. Understanding first-hand what motivates your audience, what outcomes they’re seeking, and how your brand aligns with those needs is critical to find market fit.

While AI can’t replace the specific data and insights you get from customized research it can help spark ideas on where to dig in more.

With SmokeLadder you can get high level insights into:

  • The perspective of decision makers around your brand to spot potential blockers
  • A value proposition summary to see how a buyer might describe and remember a brand

 

Buyer feedback on positioning and value prop analysis

This serves as a gut check for deeper exploration.

 

SmokeLadder benefit 4: Access to standardized analysis of positioning across thousands of brands

As mentioned above, in the same way you might conduct analysis and research for a brand’s SEO health using Semrush we provide a way to do this for positioning.

Until now there hasn’t been a go-to source for this type of data and insights. 

Search for positioning examples

Even with a skilled strategist it could take days or weeks to explore different competitor websites, analyze them, and compile the data.

With SmokeLadder, there’s now a place to access this critical information across thousands of brands. 

It can help strategists, marketers, and founders discover competitors you didn’t consider and highlight opportunities that you might overlook otherwise. 

And of course if there’s a brand we haven’t analyzed yet, you can run your own analysis in minutes.

 

Elevating the entire positioning process for founders, marketers, and agencies

We’re big believers in finding ways to use AI not to replace human work, but elevate it.

When it comes to challenges that involve analysis and organization of large amounts of data – like the positioning of thousands of brands – AI can be an incredibly valuable tool.

Our goal with SmokeLadder was to provide a tool that allows teams and individuals to spend more time and energy focused on deep strategic work, leveraging this positioning data, and helping brands succeed. 

We see SmokeLadder being a perfect fit for two core use cases:

  • Founders and marketers working on their own brand: Analyzing and refining their positioning to create stronger alignment with their target customers 
  • Agency strategists working on their client’s brands: Conducting research and providing insights to their clients more effectively and efficiently to improve client outcomes

SmokeLadder fills a big gap in the market and can become a standard resource for established brands and startups alike.

Our goal is to make positioning work more effective and more accessible for businesses so that they can find their unique place to stand out and win in these wildly crowded markets.

You can try the product for free without credit card info or even creating an account

Go here to see an example analysis and get started creating stronger positioning for your own brand.

 

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.

Jasper.AI vs Scalenut – AI Copilot positioning strategy | From 10 to Win

Jasper.AI vs Scalenut - AI Copilot platforms

Positioning analysis of Jasper.AI vs Scalenut using SmokeLadder

There are 4 key factors that might drive you to shift your positioning:

  1. You learned something new about your customer’s needs (aka. Jobs to Be Done)
  2. Your products or services have changed (new features, new offering, etc.)
  3. The competitive landscape has shifted or evolved.
  4. Market conditions have shifted or evolved.

A prime example of (4) is Google’s latest update to penalize sites that abuse AI generated content.

And for all the generative content products out there that have been leaning hard into a value prop around:

Automatically publish mass content in minutes!

…this needs real attention.

Some brands in the space like Jasper had already been building a position that focuses on AI as a tool to elevate work rather than automate it away.

Their message of “better outcomes, not just faster outputs” strikes a great balance.

But other players in the “one click to create thousands of articles in seconds” boat will need a hard pivot asap.

Again, it’s not that AI assisted content is going away it’s that it requires a shift in how some of these products position their tools and teach customers the right way to use them.

In my latest episode of From 10 to Win, I look at how the SEO-focused AI copilot product Scalenut could adjust part of their positioning around this point.

Specifically I dig into an important point of value that applies to this market shift:

Reduce Risk

Video Transcript:

In this episode we’re looking at AI Copilot platforms to see how these two brands, Jasper.AI and Scalenut are each positioning themselves in the face of the shifting landscape of generative AI content.

 

Website messaging and positioning reviews of Jasper.AI and Scalenut

We can start off by looking at Jasper’s homepage here. They’ve got their big headline marketing revolutionized by AI.

Jasper.AI homepage headline

It’s a little broad for my taste. I would rather it have something a bit more specific about how they do that. But I do like their sub headline here where they talk about the tool being for enterprise marketing teams who want better outcomes, not just faster outputs, This is an idea that they’ve been leaning into for a while. And I think at this moment in time, it’s particularly important with some of the the shifts around Google and their algorithm, which we’ll talk about more in a few minutes.

Let’s jump over to Scalenut’s homepage.

Scalenut's homepage headline

We can see their rotating headline here, scale traffic, scale conversions, scale demand from search, Scalenut’s value prop really centers around being an SEO tool. You can see their sub headline AI co pilot that powers the entire SEO content life cycle.

 

Jasper.AI vs Scalenut – SmokeLadder Positioning analysis

Let’s compare and contrast Scalenut with Jasper.ai.

Jasper.AI vs Scalenut positioning analysis

And this chart is showing us the the fingerprint of each of these sites, their fingerprint of value, If we move left to right, we can see some points where in orange, scale nut is a little higher, generate revenue, inform, marketability, And then the blue, we can see some points where Jasper scored higher, integrate, come over here, reduce effort, reduce risk, to point, I wanna come back to you in a minute. If we scroll down, we can see all the descriptions for both sites, why they got their individual scores.

And then down here are the highlight points.

So on the left, we’ve got the the points where Scalenut had the best best separation from Jasper dot ai. Which are their strengths. And then in the red, the weaknesses are essentially where Jasper scored higher or had more separation from ScaleNut.

So Jasper or sorry, Scalenut strengths reach marketability, scalability, generate revenue, These all align with their value prop around SEO organic content, organic reach, And then Jasper has some strengths around integrate and reduce risk. So this was a point that I really wanted to call out because At a time, like we’re saying, where Google is really shifting how they treat AI generated content, they just recently re released a big update around this. And specifically, they are going to be punishing in a sense, sites that lean too heavily or abuse AI generated content.

 

Where Scalenut has opportunities to improve and win

And I think this is something that these brands, both Jasper and Scalenut and a bunch of other companies really need to take note of and think about how they talk about this point.

A lot of times we think about reduced risk being a little more focused around things like security. But in this case, reducing risk might mean how does the the company help protect brands from abusing certain types of content that might get them in trouble with with Google or other search platforms.

Let’s jump back over to Jasper site for a second because I wanna just take a quick look at one of the ways that they address this If we come down here, we can see they put this really nice emphasis around how they integrate your brand’s positioning, your company’s strategy, voice and style guide, all things to help create content that’s very specific to your brand and not just generating, generic stuff that you would put out, that you would essentially just automate and publish and potentially then get in trouble for.

I wanna come over now to ScaleNut site.

Again, their their whole focus here is around scale and reach and we can come down here. They’ve got some impressive stats, five million SEO blogs created. That’s a lot.

And then walking through some of their features around the SEO platform, how they help you create SEO content that ranks, auditing, analysis, But this is the piece I really wanted to focus in.

Write SEO friendly blogs in less than five minutes.

This is the type of message that I would be concerned about, and this is where I think that reduced risk message or point of value really comes into play where a brand or product like ScaleNet needs to be thinking about how their customers might inadvertently or intentionally abuse some of these tools and end up hurting them, you know, in SEO and organic reach, the exact thing that they’re trying to provide value around, they might end up giving them tools and actually hurt them in the long run.

So I think a brand like scale that really needs to think about their positioning in this case, and take some notes from a brand like Jasper and see how they’re talking about these things in a maybe a slightly more safe or responsible way, and just help guide your users, help guide them to understand that These tools can all be extremely powerful, but let’s think about how they can elevate the work and not just automate the work. So that’s that’s kind of like the big takeaway here is I think they they could focus a little more on this reduced risk value point to to really help improve their positioning at this exact moment in time. Where the market is shifting and the rules are shifting and how Google and search handles AI content is shifting.

These are just some initial thoughts.

Take a look on on our site and analyze your own site, analyze some competitor site, see if you can uncover some some places in your own positioning to help you better take on a market leader.

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.

Podium vs Intercom – Customer support platform positioning strategy | From 10 to Win

Podium vs Intercom - customer support platforms

Positioning analysis of Intercom vs Podium using SmokeLadder

Strong positioning shows customers you have a *specific* pov into their needs.

That specificity does two key things:
1) It shows that you understand their needs on a deep level, which builds trust
2) It creates separation from other solutions, which makes you memorable

When you don’t do this, you end up with a broad, generalized position that overlaps with competitors and dumps you onto the giant pile of forgettable solutions.

The extra sneaky thing is that a broad position will often sound totally fine on paper.

It may even be backed up by customer research.

It’s not wrong it’s just not as effective.

Video Transcript:

In this episode we’re looking at Customer Support platforms to see how the brand Podium could sharpen their positioning to take on a market leader, like Intercom.

 

Website messaging and positioning reviews of Intercom and Podium

First we’ll look at intercom’s website, their homepage, Big headline, the only AI customer service solution you need. They’re really leaning into some of their new AI tools.

Intercome homepage headline

And the support for that, getting more done faster with our AI enhanced workspace, big play here around efficiency, reducing effort, pretty much what AI is built to do.

And really suits a company that has a lot of customer support issues. So that makes a lot of sense.

Let’s jump over to podium site, see what they’re saying, their headline, get more leads, make more money, beat your competition.

Podium home page headline

Also have their powered by AI in here, which is kind of mandatory these days.

But their focus here a little bit more on the revenue generation growth side of things. But if we come down here, we can see they do also talk about simplification, reducing effort for for customers.

Alright. Let’s take a look at our app. Here’s our home page. Find out exactly where your B2B rank can win. That’s what we’re aiming to do.

Jumping into the app, we can see we’ve analyzed both sites. We’re looking at podium site first. Their total positioning score built off of the value they provide on one side and then differentiation on the other side.

First, we’ll look at value.

We analyze every site on these twenty four points of value scale on a scale of one to ten. On the far side, right side, we can see which points they scored the highest in. We have save time, simplify, connect, reach, reduce effort, responsive.

All things that definitely correlate to customer support platforms. So that’s that all makes sense.

Let’s come into the differentiation tab.

First, we can see how they compare against category averages. So other customer support tools. And we can see some separation here for podium, which is good. The highlight points down here at the bottom generate revenue, ties directly to their their big headline. That makes sense. Reach, being able to expand and grow connects to customers saving time.

Let’s come down and see how they compare though against intercom.

 

Podium vs Intercom – SmokeLadder Positioning analysis

This chart here is showing us the comparison between intercom scores and podium scores, podium in the orange intercom in the blue turquoise color.

Podium vs Intercom - positioning analysis

If we move left to right, we can see points where they’re pretty similar like connects. We can see points where intercom actually has some advantages and separation like organize and some points where podium has some slight advantages. If we come down to the bottom, we can see also here the descriptions of why they got the scores they did.

And down here, we can see Where did podium have the most separation from intercom? That was around generate revenue, reach, reputation, marketability, and intercom podium’s weaknesses being intercom strengths.

We have configurable innovation, totally makes sense again with their with intercom’s big push around AI and organization.

So this all makes sense, but it’s not It’s not that podium doesn’t have some advantages here, but I don’t necessarily think they’re leaning in as hard as they could into a few specific points.

 

Where Podium has opportunities to win

If we come over here, we can see this point connects where they scored fairly well, but pretty much even with intercom, responsive, pretty much even with intercom and vision.

These are the three points I want to focus on. And I wanna come back over to podium site for a minute because they are telling part of their story with their messaging, but they’re also complimenting that with some of the visuals they use, and they really focus on a lot of visuals of small local businesses.

And what’s important here to think about is rather than intercom’s, position that that’s focusing on efficiency and using AI to organize and handle hundreds or thousands of customer support tickets, Podium’s focus here is more on small businesses and I think they would be better off rather than trying to lean into strictly, kind of a similar type of promise or position as intercom around efficiency and vacation and thinking a little bit more about connects, thinking about responsiveness. With a small business, it’s a little bit less about volume and the organization of dealing with all these different tickets and support requests, or or sales inquiries, and it’s I think more about the personal connection and recognizing that every single customer really matters when you’re small business.

And you wanna be able to reach them as soon as they as soon as they reach out to you, you wanna be able to connect with them. And you need to build strong connections with them, personal connections with them. So I think that those points around connects and responsiveness are even more important given who they seem to be targeting, which is which is our small businesses. The last point that I think they could emphasize a little more vision.

Again, with small businesses, the vision of the company is going to be very emotionally connected, I think, to the to the business owner.

And being able to touch on that point and and emphasize that they really understand small businesses and and business owners I think could really play to their advantage and build a little bit of more of an emotional connection with those people.

Those are just some ideas that I think that could help podium set themselves apart. I think they’re on the right track. They’re focused on small businesses. I just think their position and their message could be even stronger. To emphasize how they’re the perfect solution for that kind of customer.

These are just some initial ideas. Hope this was helpful. Hope this spark some ideas and take a look at our app, try it out with your own website, look at some of your competitors and see how you could take on your own market leader.

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.

Survey platform positioning strategy – Alchemer vs SurveyMonkey | From 10 to Win

Survey platform positioning strategy

Positioning analysis of SurveyMonkey versus Alchemer using SmokeLadder

Your positioning is only as good as your ability to communicate it.

In other words, you may have a crystal clear position with strong points of differentiation – but if your messaging and website don’t convey that your customers will never know.

Video Transcript:

In this episode we’re looking at Enterprise Survey Platforms to see how challenger brand Alchemer can improve their positioning to take on market leader, SurveyMonkey.

 

Website messaging and positioning reviews of Alchemer and SurveyMonkey

We’ll start by looking at Alchemer’s website with their headline, Give every customer voice, make every voice matter.

Alchemer home page

Kind of a general statement, I think, about the importance of survey data, market research.

What I do like though about their header here is they’ve got these two lines that their software is for any company that doesn’t want the expense and complexities of Qualtrics, another market leader, or has outgrown SurveyMonkey, the market leader we’re looking at.

That’s great. I think that’s a great way to position themselves at least in a general sense that they have advantages over both of these brands and Now they just need to do a good job of explaining what those are exactly.

If we come down here, we can see in the next section, they really focus mainly on some of the core use cases, customer engagement, market engagement, employee engagement.

But, yeah, let’s let’s jump over to SurveyMonkey and see what their saying on their site. So this is their enterprise landing page. And like a lot of market leaders do, they don’t say much. It’s a very broad statement here, headline of SurveyMonkey in your enterprise.

SurveyMonkey home page headline

So you know right where you are and discover why we’re a leading survey platform for companies around the globe. Super general, but they do have this advantage of saying trusted by ninety five percent of the Fortune five hundred. And that’s what market leaders do. They lean into their reputation.

They lean into the fact that they have millions of users, and that’s how they build trust.

We come down here. We can see get insights to drive impact. Bring insights, teams, tools together with integrations.

Again, very high level stuff. Nothing that’s very differentiated, but that’s not really what SurveyMonkey has to do.

Let’s come over to our app and see if there’s some opportunities for Alchemer to improve their position and move up a little bit. Alright. So their total positioning score is strong.

Very good value scores overall. If we come down here, we can see all the points of value. These are the points of value we grade every website on. Twenty four different points on a scale of one to ten. On the right hand side, the points where they scored the highest responsive, simplify, organize, connects, reach, reduce effort, all great things.

Now let’s jump over to the differentiation tab.

This first section is comparing Alchemer versus our category averages for other research tools. And we can see there’s lots of good points of separation here down in the highlight points, integrate, responsive, generate revenue, configurable.

 

Alchemer vs SurveyMonkey – SmokeLadder Positioning analysis

Let’s come down here and see how they compare specifically against the SurveyMonkey Landing page.

Alchemer vs SurveyMonkey analysis

So here we can see in blue is the SurveyMonkey page and orange is the Alchemer page. So there are some points where SurveyMonkey has advantages, expertise being one, reputation being one, as the market leader, those are things we would expect.

 

Where Alchemer has opportunities to win

Alchemer has some advantages to connects, organize, responsive, simplify. Those are all good things too. Let’s come down and we can see the descriptions for why they got the scores that they did.

And then down here, their specific points of strength where they have the most separation from SurveyMonkey responsive, connects, reach, generate revenue, But I wanna come back up here because I think there’s a couple points that I think they could do a better job of emphasizing around, and that’s simplify and reduce effort. These are both points where they scored well and have some separation from SurveyMonkey.

But I think they could lean into these even more to create a stronger overall identity.

If we come back to their site, let’s keep going down past the use cases, past the social proof.

We have this section here where they talk about feedback software with all the power, none of the pain. They’re hinting a little bit here at the idea of they have a powerful tool that’s easier to use which I think is great. That’s that’s kind of along the lines of what we wanna get at here. If we come down a little further, we can see their products. And in the middle, this this product, in particular, I think, is interesting, their Alchemer workflow. It’s a no code workflow product that allows teams to integrate surveys into other channels that they’re using. So whether you’re a marketer or you’re a customer engagement person, you can set these integrations up without having to bring in a developer.

This is a huge benefit. This is this means, like, reducing effort, reducing cost, reducing, time to get these these things set up within your organization.

I think these are the kinds of things that Alchemer should really be leaning into even more. This identity of we simplify things we’re reducing effort. And then as a result of that, we’re also reducing cost. But there’s one other thing I wanna look at This is their dedicated landing page that compares them versus SurveyMonkey.

And down in this third slot here. They talk about their support.

They’ve got great support or at least that’s what they’re known for. That’s what they’ve been rated well for, on g two specifically.

And this is yet another point where they can talk about the fact that they help reduce effort reduce costs by providing great support, meaning your team isn’t left on their own to figure stuff out or having to pull in internal resources to figure stuff out. They can reach out to outcome or support and get it get it right away.

I think these are all great, great things that they could really bring together and tell a compelling story around. Let’s come over to the Last thing, the AI insights tab, I just wanted to call out specifically in this decision maker insights section, the CFO, also calls out this same idea of the automation of surveys with no code workflows can result in cost savings. So when you think about the CFO as being the one who might ultimately be making the decision on whether or not to spend money on this, also focusing in on this same idea of there’s there’s cost savings here because of the simplification and the reducing of effort taking that it takes to implement their their software.

And also in the value proposition evaluation, memorable strengths integrates with existing systems, no code automation workflows.

So This is what I think Alchemer should be leaning into even more with their identity. So rather than just talking about the importance of survey data and how it can help your organization talking about how they implement it and how they make it easier for teams to to bring these kinds of systems to life. This is just high level analysis. Hopefully, it gives you some ideas about how you could use our tool to analyze your site, analyze competitors, and hopefully, take on your own market leader.

Go analyze a website!
Your positioning will thank you.